An AI agent with access to your CRM, your documents, and your email is the most powerful — and most dangerous — tool you can deploy. The same capabilities that make agents useful (tool access, autonomy, reasoning) make them a security surface unlike anything IT has managed before.
Most organizations are deploying agents with security practices designed for traditional software. That’s a mistake. Agents reason, improvise, and take actions their designers didn’t anticipate. Security for agentic AI requires new thinking.
This course teaches that thinking — from threat models specific to AI agents to practical security architectures that enable deployment without creating unacceptable risk.
What You’ll Learn
Agent-specific threat models — prompt injection (direct and indirect), tool misuse, data exfiltration through reasoning chains, privilege escalation via tool access. The threats that don’t exist in traditional software
Data privacy architecture — what data flows to the model provider? What stays on your infrastructure? Data classification frameworks for agent inputs and outputs. GDPR implications of agent-processed personal data
Access control for agents — least-privilege tool access, scoped permissions, sandbox environments. How to give agents enough access to be useful without giving them the keys to everything
Alignment in practice — instruction hierarchy, system prompts, guardrails, output validation, behavioral boundaries. How to make agents do what you intend, not just what you literally say
Self-hosted vs. cloud AI — security trade-offs of API-based models (OpenAI, Anthropic) vs. self-hosted (Ollama, vLLM). Data residency, latency, cost, and the hybrid architectures most enterprises adopt
Audit and observability — logging agent reasoning chains, tool calls, and decisions. Building audit trails that satisfy compliance requirements. Monitoring for anomalous agent behavior
Regulatory compliance — GDPR, AI Act, GxP (pharma), DORA/MaRisk (finance), NIS2 (critical infrastructure). What each requires for AI agent deployments and how to document compliance
Incident response — what happens when an agent goes wrong? Containment, investigation, and remediation playbooks specific to agentic AI incidents
Who This Is For
CISOs and security architects defining AI security policies
Data protection officers assessing GDPR implications of agent deployments
Compliance and risk managers in regulated industries
IT directors responsible for infrastructure and access control decisions
Technical leads implementing agent security in production
Participants should have a basic understanding of AI agents (Agentic AI Foundations is recommended but not required).
Format & Duration
2-day intensive (on-site). Day 1: threat models, data privacy, access control, and alignment with live attack demonstrations. Day 2: participants develop a security policy and architecture for an agent deployment in their own organization, including regulatory compliance mapping.
What Makes This Course Different
Security courses for AI typically focus on model training (data poisoning, adversarial examples) — relevant for ML researchers, irrelevant for enterprises deploying pre-trained agents. This course focuses on deployment security: the risks that emerge when you give an AI agent tools, data, and autonomy in your organization.
The threat demonstrations are real. You’ll see prompt injection attacks that bypass naive guardrails, data leakage through reasoning chains, and privilege escalation through tool chaining. Then you’ll learn the architectures that prevent them.
Q & A
Learn more about what we do
It's a decision-maker's security course with technical depth. You won't configure firewalls, but you will understand threat models, data flow risks, and the specific security properties that agentic AI requires. Technical participants get more from the implementation details; business participants get the governance framework. Both leave with actionable security policies.
Yes — with the right architecture. We cover the specific regulatory requirements (GDPR, GxP, DORA, NIS2) that apply to AI agents and show how to design agent systems that meet them. Self-hosted models, data residency, audit trails, and explainability are all addressed. Regulation shapes the design; it doesn't prevent deployment.
Alignment means the agent does what you intended, not just what you literally asked. In practice, it covers prompt injection defense, instruction hierarchy, guardrails, output validation, and behavioral boundaries. We demonstrate real alignment failures — agents that technically followed instructions but produced harmful or unintended outcomes — and how to prevent them.
It depends on your data sensitivity, regulatory requirements, and operational capacity. We present a framework for making that decision: what data leaves your infrastructure with cloud APIs, what self-hosting actually costs (compute, maintenance, model updates), and the hybrid patterns that most enterprises end up using.